"Prophecies": The "gkg" Document

I've recently recovered files from a very old laptop of mine. Most of the documents were written on an older computer than that, in a pre-packaged word processing program that until now I could never find a "translator" for.

I've recovered two very strange documents, one labelled "jk" and the other "gkg" -- both originally written in 2006. They both seem to be of a so-called "prophetic" nature; the former I vaguely remember writing, the latter I completely do not.

Document "gkg" is in two parts:
1) prophecies
2) the nature of aliens, demons and spirit

I'm fairly freaked out about the "gkg" doc as I have zero memory of writing it. I've done a search online to see if this was copy-and-pasted from some forum or other article, but no success. I did try my hand at a bit of "automatic writing" and the like during this period -- though the idea of completely having no memory of writing something is alien and strange to me.

Is this really a "prophecy" or is some of it simply projections based on the current data of the time? The timeline in which this piece takes place is not specified. Certainly, the stuff about hurricanes on the East Coast and subway floodings have come to pass in a quite striking manner. Another part about nuclear strikes is fuzzy. The 2012 thing doesn't predict a specific apocalyptic event. And then you have the "Divine Revelations" stuff which is a whole different matter entirely; I was a Christian at the time, but not anymore. The part about the Mormons completely came out of left field. I still basically believe the "Evolution In Human Consciousness" part, though.

At any rate, I'm going to post the "prophecies" part of the "gkg" doc here, I guess for shits and giggles. But more than that -- as a way for me to better understand why I am so focused on certain topics at the moment (possible epidemics, sudden jumps in human evolution, etc.). Maybe recovering these files came at the right time for my personal evolution; if you find anything of use of it, that's cool as well.


Prophecies


1. The Revolt of Nature: 
This is happening right now. There is no steady progression here -- it is happening right now, and when it is over there will hardly be any place not effected. 


* Plague in most major cities around globe -- mandatory quarantine centers established. This is of course most traumatic in non-Third World cities, scarring the emotional landscape. Establishment of "non-contaminated" quarters of cities like New York, the line between rich & poor drawn. 


* Massive hurricane/flooding up Northeast Coast. Parts of New England effected to the point of Katrina-proportions. Flooding in NYC streets, subways knocked out. Water possibly contaminated. 


* Parts of California underwater following earthquake + tsunami. Golden Gate Bridge destroyed. San Francisco underwater. 


* Massive volcano eruption in the West. Tourist area. Massive casualties, mostly because people unprepared. 


* Solar rays considered too strong to bask in unprotected -- covering & shade required to go outside even in winter. 


* Livestock shortage -- especially poultry & beef due to various diseases. 


* Water shortage -- water valuable commodity as drinkable water supply shrinks & Earth heats up. 


* Massive flooding in large areas of Europe, resulting in unheard of damage to centuries-old landscapes. Sooner rather than later.


* NYC earthquake, enough to change landscape 


2.War:


* Strike on Iran -- not ground war, but heavy bombing massive casualties. 


* Massive strike on Israel following Iran strike -- significant damage & casualties


* Return of Cold War with Russia 


* The beginnings of warlike relations between US and South American countries as natural resources dry up. US looks at South America as "potential supplier" of natural resources whether they like it or not. 


* At least two nuclear strikes within next five years. Pakistan becomes radical Muslim state, and they have the bomb.


* Significant reduction of freedoms, especially in cities, following natural disasters. Cities become unbearable because the lines are drawn so sharply between the poor--who are most likely to be infected with plague/flu--and rich. Many rich flee cities entirely or gentrify them completely and build new cities where poor are bussed in to do menial labor.


* Chinese attempt to invade devastated West Coast of US


* China/Japan/Korea fusion 


 * Attack on NYC resulting in altered skyline 


* US expands borders to include parts of Canada & Mexico 


* Large numbers of US population at Third World level following economic collapse, massive unemployment. Draft held in large part to deal with growing unemployment situation.


3.Human Consciousness Evolution:
 

* Selected people will spontaneously get "enlightened" at an ever increasing rate. Exodus of selected people out of cities or other areas to be effected the most.


* Highly psychic & intelligent children being born


* High number of angelic & demonic "walk-ins" entering human hosts for first time


* Latent angelic/demonic/alien walk-ins spontaneously emerge with great abilities


* Many wonders and miracles; high communication between spirit, interdimensional, & human worlds


* "breakdown" in our current conception of the mechanics of reality. malfunctions in time. it will be like a computer program with glitches. hallucinations, time anomalies, increased "ghost" activity, disappearances


4. Fulfillment of Divine Prophecies:
 

* Christian concept of The Rapture -- many highly enlightened souls will leave the Earth with their bodies -- just completely disappear off the planet.


* Mayan 2012 -- The dividing line between history as we know it from Sumeria until now and what it is to become. Some of this is because of the ravaged state of the Earth. And some is because of the highly evolving human consciousness. There will be Earth polarity issues that will not destroy the planet but really mess up the nature of reality as we know it. 


* Pay credence to Mormon prophecy, because there is something to it


* The New City -- God doesn't build it (directly, at any rate), people do. 


 * Twilight of the Gods - the "Gods" are all those seemingly all-powerful things on Earth right now. 


* A birth of a child does set the really major events off -- just by the simple fact of the child's birth 


*  War between good & evil -- between angelic & demonic human hosts


Read More

Sync Watch: Is Red Mask Symbolism Heralding A New Plague?

"And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all" --Edgar Allan Poe, The Masque Of The Red Death

I noticed a lot of "red mask" symbolism last week -- probably at least one a day, either in news stories or movies I watched. There's also been a lot of talk of flu epidemics, "norovirus" epidemics, and elder celebrities suddenly finding themselves sick and in the ICU.

So here's a little "sync carnival" I put together entitled, "The Red Masque of Captain Chaos."

I'm sure it's not heralding some sort of age of pestilence, or something.

From "Drudge Report," 1/25/13





" The rap titan sported a red makeshift mask similar to the one worn by the superhero in Paris yesterday. "
-- The Sun, 1/24/13

Cover of the comic book "Red Hood & The Outlaws" #16, which hit stands 1/23/13

Jack Of  Diamonds from "Seven Psychopaths"

Dom DeLuise's alter-ego Captain Chaos from "Cannibal Run"

Burt Reynolds in ICU with flu; 1/26/13

Gawker, 1/27/13

Burt Reynolds and Barbara Walters, circa 1980



 





The Atlantic, 1/25/13





"And thus too, it happened, perhaps, that before the last echoes of the last chime had utterly sunk into silence, there were many individuals in the crowd who had found leisure to become aware of the presence of a masked figure which had arrested the attention of no single individual before. And the rumor of this new presence having spread itself whisperingly around, there arose at length from the whole company a buzz, or murmur, expressive of disapprobation and surprise — then, finally, of terror, of horror, and of disgust. In an assembly of phantasms such as I have painted, it may well be supposed that no ordinary appearance could have excited such sensation. In truth the masquerade license of the night was nearly unlimited; but the figure in question had out-Heroded Herod, and gone beyond the bounds of even the prince's indefinite decorum. There are chords in the hearts of the most reckless which cannot be touched without emotion. Even with the utterly lost, to whom life and death are equally jests, there are matters of which no jest can be made. The whole company, indeed, seemed now deeply to feel that in the costume and bearing of the stranger neither wit nor propriety existed. The figure was tall and gaunt, and shrouded from head to foot in the habiliments of the grave. The mask which concealed the visage was made so nearly to resemble the countenance of a stiffened corpse that the closest scrutiny must have had difficulty in detecting the cheat. And yet all this might have been endured, if not approved, by the mad revellers around. But the mummer had gone so far as to assume the type of the Red Death. His vesture was dabbled in blood — and his broad brow, with all the features of the face, was besprinkled with the scarlet horror."

--Edgar Allan Poe, The Masque Of The Red Death

Red Shirt = Death

Jack of Diamonds

 

Red Death reads the cards...



...as does the Joker...



..."Diamond" Jack...






...who started his career as "The Red Hood"





1/30 UPDATE: two more news stories hitting today that carry the red mask/plague theme

From The Atlantic:

And from Drudge (note red mask & red hood):

Read More

Jimmy Savile Outed By Comedian David Mitchell In 2007

Comedian David Mitchell "outed" Jimmy Savile back in 2007, according this clip from his show "That Mitchell Webb" look:



When I first saw this clip on TV last week, my jaw literally dropped open. This was way before the official investigations regarding sexual abuse, pedophilia, and possible satanic rituals performed by Savile.


In the skit, an image of Savile flashes on the screen while TV news announcer Mitchell reports that he has been convicted and sentenced to three life sentences. Mitchell continues:

"A spokesman says, 'you think you know a guy, and then he goes and does something like that.'"

Was this Mitchell's way of "outing" Savile for he crimes, albeit in a vague manner "protected" by comedy? As the investigation of the late Savile continues, it has been revealed that his crimes were well-known by the entertainment community, and that other people connected to the BBC might have been involved.

Savile seemed like a powerful, influential guy within BBC circles. If he was involved in a pedophilia ring that included other people of power and fame, that would mean he wielded considerable blackmailing capabilities -- making the "open secret" regarding his crimes verboten in terms of "squealing." Any celebrity who would try to make these crimes -- or rumors of crimes -- public would get blackballed from the industry.

Was this the case with David Mitchell? Was he bravely trying to tip off the public about Savile using his comedy sketch show? Or was this all a big coincidence?

There is one more issue to consider here. Even if someone like Mitchell was to take the ultimate chance and speak out on Savile, would he even be believed? It must sound to the public "crazy" that a beloved entertainment personality could be possible of such depravity.

Of course, now that the Savile case is public, it is much harder to use the "beloved entertainment personality" thing as a "proof" of innocence. In the end, these people are "performers". Their public "personas" are not the same as who they are deep inside. But in a celebrity-obsessed culture, I think that fact becomes majorly lost.

Read More

Disappearing Trick: Twin Towers "Erased" From "The Carrie Diaries"

While I understand the need to be sensitive to the loved ones of 9/11 victims, is "writing out" the entire Twin Towers from the annals of pop-culture history the way to go about it?

I refer to the new CW "Sex and the City" prequel series "The Carrie Diaries," and the way the producers consciously "erased" the WTC from the show. The main character works in Lower Manhattan in the 1980s -- of course there would be some trace of the two buildings in the skyline, or mentioned at all during the show.

But no:

"When we really sat down to talk about whether we wanted to put the World Trade Center into any of our stock footage what we decided is this is a show about love and romance and coming of age...If one 16-year-old who is watching the show possibly lost a parent—if we caused them pause or hurt in any way—it wouldn't have been worth it."

But isn't removing all trace of the Twin Towers also hurtful, in a sense? Isn't it a denial of what happened? I mean, this is hardly a "9/11 Truther" issue, here. Whatever you believe regarding the circumstances of the tragic event, the buildings did go down. It wasn't a David Copperfield trick.

Should the logo for this Woody Allen movie be changed?

This isn't the first time the Twin Towers have been "erased," either in the original "Sex and the City" or other TV shows/movies. And those who do chose to refer to 9/11 are often accused of being "insensitive"...even though this is a historical event that definitely without a doubt happened and set the tone for world events for over a decade.

What other "sensitive" bits of history will be tossed down the rabbit memory hole?

Read More

Book Review: "Dead Wrong" By Richard Belzer and David Wayne

 "There are those in positions of power who malign the pursuit of justice by intentionally associating the word "conspiracy" with the delirious hallucinations of unbalanced minds. They're wrong. The real-world definition of conspiracy is simply; two or more persons agreeing to commit a crime. In short, they are everywhere, a constant component of daily events throughout our history, and are by no means the restless imaginings of an over-attentive audience.
--Richard Belzer, "Dead Wrong"

Richard Belzer, the co-author of the book "Dead Wrong" (2012, Skyhorse Publishing) is a synchromystic "nexus" in his own right; his conspiracy-theorist role John Munch appearing on more different TV shows than any other character. Outside of his main "beats" on Homicide and Law & Order SVU, Munch has "crossed over" in The X-Files, Arrested Development, The Wire, Luther, and a number of others. These "crossovers" are significant in that they not only have transcended the barriers of individual television programs, but even whole networks.

Munch/Belzer on "X-Files"

But perhaps even more "meta" than that is the fact that in real life, Belzer is a real, for lack of a better term, "conspiracy theorist." Or perhaps he is just a man who has a great deal of curiosity; an investigator into cases that are considered "closed" by our mainstream media. In that sense, he is truly not that different from Detective Munch.

And the book "Dead Wrong" indeed reads far more like a police procedural than a standard "conspiracy" text. Reviewing the deaths of such public figures as Martin Luther King Jr., Marilyn Monroe, and JFK, "Dead Wrong" places a strong emphasis on forensic evidence; while there is some speculation on motives and grander assassination plots, the focus always returns to "just the facts, ma'am."

Belzer and co-writer David Wayne's approach here, therefore, continually maintains this subliminal connection to Munch and the Homicide/Law & Order shows. And it becomes increasingly clear that these murder/"suicides," when seen through the cold, clinical eyes of the detective, have a whole lot more going on about them than the "official story." In the cases of figures like Monroe -- the forensic evidence of her death pretty much ruling out suicide -- this is quite disturbing.

Unless the forensics and other evidence that Belzer and Wayne so meticulously present here are falsified, "Dead Wrong" is a bombshell text in not only the genre, but in history books in general.

I do not exaggerate when I use the term "meticulously." If there is a flaw in this book, it's that the same evidence will be repeated over and over in the course of a chapter; though I have to wonder if this is less a problem with the editing and more of a conscious tactic to literally hammer home into our heads the importance of the forensics here.

While there's not a lot of actual conspiracy "theory" here, Belzer and Wayne come up with some very interesting ways of looking at famous cases that I never considered before. For example, the assassination of JFK. It is suggested in "Dead Wrong" that the reason the government engaged in such a massive cover-up was not so much because they were involved in the assassination (though a few rogue elements within might have been) -- but that discovering the truth about the assassination would in turn compromise other CIA operations:

"The cover-up was apparently necessitated by the exposure and implication of covert U.S. intelligence anti-Castro operations which were utilizing the Mafia to attempt to assassinate Fidel Castro. It is an often overlooked fact that in the immediate aftermath of the assassination, Robert F. Kennedy was the most powerful person in the United States -- more so than even new President Lyndon B. Johnson. In the hours after the murder, it was Robert Kennedy and Kennedy loyalists who controlled the autopsy, the doctors, the body of President Kennedy, and the actions of much of the Secret Service, law enforcement, and emergency personnel...Obviously, Robert Kennedy was not involved in the death plot against his brother. But just as obviously, his hand was forced into covering up the true circumstances surrounding the murder."

The forensic evidence is inconsistent with the notion she fatally overdosed on these pills

So we have the idea here that the parties who engage in cover-ups might not be the same ones who have committed the initial crimes. Same thing for Monroe -- she wasn't murdered by the Kennedys, but the Kennedys had to conduct a full cover-up in order to keep other secrets safe.

"Dead Wrong" ends with an afterward by Jesse Ventura. He reiterates a crucial point Belzer mentions in the introduction and which is exemplified in the methodology of the book itself: the idea that the word "conspiracy" has been automatically conflated with "crazy" in our mass-media, and why this is an erroneous assumption to make. Writes Ventura:

"Another disturbing trend in recent events is what I see as the very intentional manipulation of the word "conspiracy." They would have us believe that any person who believes that something might possibly be a conspiracy has to be a demented individual. They make it sound like one would have to be crazy to even suspect that members of our government could take part in a conspiracy. I suggest that the truth of the matter is quite the contrary. As this book has clearly established, conspiracies are not some rare occurrence in history. They are common. They can and do happen all the time."

Unless reading a lot of procedural/science stuff deeply bores you, I would strongly recommend adding "Dead Wrong" to your library. As much as I like the more esoteric/"outre" books on these topics, texts like this have the greatest ability to change minds...or at least render minds more open to new ideas and possibilities.

"Dead Wrong" is available at:
Skyhorse Publishing
Amazon.com
the iBooks store, and more

Read More

The Problem With Uncle Charlie: "Stoker", Savile, and the MK-Girls Revisited

The poster for the movie "Stoker" - pay attention to that key around her neck

I have started reading the Illuminati/MK-Ultra epic "Thanks For The Memories" by Brice Taylor. There is a whole genre of conspiracy-lore that I call, for lack of a better term, "MK-Girls" -- narratives concerning women who are allegedly born into/recruited/exploited/abused and otherwise turned into sex slave assassins by a secret society/Illuminati/warlocks/CIA/etc.

 

While my description of such narratives sounds rather flip, these stories are on the whole harrowing tales containing every sort of horrible thing that can be done to another human being that one can possibly imagine. They also often feature the name-dropping of celebrities and/or detailed descriptions of "satanic" rituals -- two factors that usually lead most media, as well as the ordinary Joe, to dismiss such claims as the fantasies of a disturbed mind.

I've always viewed stories such as Brice Taylor's with a very heavy grain of salt. She claims to have recovered her memories of being a Hollywood/political sex-robot (I'm saying this literally) after having a vehicle accident that gave her a head injury -- this is very similar to the circumstances to which Roseanne Barr, who also claimed to have been sexually molested, experienced when she was 16. So the "easy" answer here is to "blame" all these claims of abuse (and more fantastic-sounding things, like being "owned" by late comedian Bob Hope) on some sort of organic brain anomaly.

But there are two things that have had me revise this initial assessment to be, if not completely credulous of all these claims, at least slightly more open-minded about them.

Jimmy Savile

First thing: the Jimmy Savile scandal at the BBC. This fucker pulled off shit that is on-par with Taylor's narrative -- beloved celebrity involved in massive serial underage sexual abuse, within a pedophile "ring" of other celebrities and persons involved in the entertainment industry. So for someone to write off "Thanks For The Memories" based solely on the claim that Bob Hope was involved...we can just take one look at the Savile case and revise that particular criteria.

Here is what one victim of Savile's told her doctor had happened; imagine if someone like Brice Taylor had said the same thing:

She recalled being led into a room that was filled with candles on the lowest level of the hospital, somewhere that was not regularly used by staff. Several adults were there, including Jimmy Savile who, like the others, was wearing a robe and a mask. “She recognised him because of his distinctive voice and the fact that his blond hair was protruding from the side of the mask. He was not the leader but he was seen as important because of his fame. “She was molested, raped and beaten and heard words that sounded like ‘Ave Satanas’, a Latin­ised version of ‘Hail Satan’, being chanted. There was no mention of any other child being there and she cannot remember how long the attack lasted but she was left extremely frightened and shaken.”

Again, it has to be emphasized here: this is a real investigation that is still going on in Britain and has been taken extremely seriously. This is not a self-pubbed book or a YouTube slideshow. And yet the stories of Taylor, this girl in the Savile case, and countless other women all seem to have similar elements. Is this the result of some sort of mass mental delusion? Is this the result of confusing reality with pop-culture? Or is pop-culture merely mirroring -- almost "confessing," if you will -- what is really going on?

I have no firm answer here. I am merely asking questions.

Second thing: I wrote an entire comic book for Marvel Comics, "Punisher MAX: Butterfly" that featured pretty much EVERY MK-Girls theme and symbol in it -- including a big fucking monarch butterfly on the front cover -- without any idea I was doing it. Every symbol: butterflies, kitten alters, doll imagery & porcelain face, Delta "assassin" programming, being "thrown off the freedom train," incest, dissociation, multiple personalities, etc. It was only in retrospect, after encountering MK-Girls lore, that I realized this comic was essentially one more (albeit unconsciously written) such narrative.

It should also be noted that the comic was targeted for a massive campaign against it in the comics "media" (such as it is) in an attempt to "bury" it (including one reviewer quaintly suggesting that I have my hands chopped off at the wrists to prevent me from ever writing again). This encompassed an intense round of cyberbullying (even directed to those who dared give it positive reviews) and anonymous threats of violence and death emailed directly to me -- the latter of which I took so seriously as to never appear in public signings again.

(Of course, what was the plot of the comic? A woman who, through a book, exposes a conspiracy -- and literally gets hounded to death to keep silent. So the irony of the situation was just bloody brilliant.)

 This all begs the question: is the MK-Girls mythos, and its symbology, some sort of archetypal thing? Was I tapping, in some shamanic way, into some bigger Thing by writing this book? Are these symbols and situations so ingrained in the history of humankind and its rituals (my comic book references Sumerian mythology at the end) that it was merely a case of "channeling" these ideas as soon as the fingers hit the keyboard? Is pop-culture to blame, putting strange ideas in people's heads? Or again, is pop-culture -- of which, by writing this mass-produced bit of fiction, I now belong to -- unconsciously/consciously mirroring some dark corner of our society?

Again -- I am merely asking questions.

All of the preceding is a rather large and perhaps unwieldy prologue to the synchromystic post at hand, about a strange, recurring figure in pop-culture: "Uncle Charlie."

We start with the trailer for the upcoming Nicole Kidman starrer "Stoker," a Hitchcockian (or Brian dePalmian, take your pick) thriller featuring a teenager played by Mia Wasikowska whose strange, emotionless "Uncle Charlie" comes to visit after her father dies:

As we see in the trailer, Uncle Charlie appears to be a complete predatory psycho, who not only acts seductively to his so-called niece, India, but seems to indoctrinate her into the art of killing and violence culminating with the girl handling an assassin's rifle:

Coincidentally enough, Brice Taylor had her own Uncle Charlie, a strange emotionless man who indoctrinates her into the world of sex slavery and political intrigue:

"Uncle Charlie was very distinguished looking and wore formal clothes...in a compete nightmarish horror, I watched as my grown father looked retarded and became very childlike when this relative, Charles Lilley Horn, spoke to him. And when the talk turned to subjects I could not fathom, and Uncle Charlie held out a paper for my father to sign...Uncle Charlie further directed my father where to take me for early programming that involved machines and told him about the arrangement with Bob Hope and the connection to the government."

Following up on the line in the "Stoker" trailer about Uncle Charlie looking very much like India's dad, we get this passage from Taylor:

"...Uncle Charlie very secretly and with great import informed me that he was my real father and that dad wasn't my real father...when I asked Uncle Charlie who my real mother was he just nodded quickly and said "You don't gave one, it doesn't matter."

Taylor's Uncle Charlie then allegedly introduces her to Henry Kissinger, which starts her down the road of political intrigue/prostitution.

In "Stoker," Wasikowska is very much portraying the MK-Girls narrative of the underage innocent who is seduced, possibly involved in incest, corrupted, manipulated and even driven to violence. If we want to find another thematic link to the actress and the subject matter, it is interesting to note that her most famous role to date is the title role in Tim Burton's "Alice In Wonderland":

Note how the symbol of the keyhole leads back to the key she is wearing in the "Stoker" poster

Taylor cites the figure of Alice as being very crucial to her programming. From a scene in "Thanks For The Memories" taking place in Disneyland:

"Next, the man took me to scary rides and poked me with needles in my waist and legs while he said things during the Alice in Wonderland ride, like, "This is not really happening. I am not really sticking this needle in your leg. You are just like Alice. You also ate the large mushroom and feel funny -- this is not real."

But as any film buff knows, the "Stoker" Uncle Charlie is far from the most famous. That honor would go to the Uncle Charlie played by Joseph Cotten in the 1943 thriller "A Shadow of A Doubt" (originally titled, "Uncle Charlie"). You will be shocked to know that this U.C. is also a creepy, semi-incestuous criminally-minded individual who manipulates his teenage niece.

Uncle Charlie in 1943's "Shadow Of A Doubt"...

...and Uncle Charlie from 2013's "Stoker"

So here you have this archetype of "Uncle Charlie" -- the corrupter, the "real dad," the indoctrinator, the metaphorical or literal perpetrator of incest.

Did Brice Taylor "misremember" her Uncle Charlie from the plot of "Shadow of a Doubt"? Is "Uncle Charlie" a bit more than that -- a predatory boogieman/tulpa haunting the lives of exploited teenage girls? Is it a "code word" of some sort for an actual operative that infiltrates families and indoctrinates these young women into some horrible type of MK-Ultra/cult type situation?

Psychopathic Eyes: The "Uncle Charlie" Archetype

I wanted to take a look once again at the cast of "Stoker" before I end this post. Nicole Kidman plays an ineffectual mother who is unable/unwilling/blind to the conspiracy that surrounds her and that involves her daughter -- a role much like the wife in the Stanley Kubrick "Illuminati" classic "Eyes Wide Shut":

And while Matthew Goode may not seem like a household name, he looked naggingly familiar to me. Looking him up on IMDB, I realized why:

He played Ozymandias in "Watchmen."

In the end, it could just be that Brice Taylor was indeed the sufferer of childhood abuse who created a "fantasy" world where that abuse included celebrities and political figures in a ring of pedophilia and odd rituals culled from a Hammer film. It could be that the figure of "Uncle Charlie" is nothing more than something used in a film in the 1940s, then "homaged" in "Stoker"...with Taylor, as suggested, being influenced by the former.

And perhaps all the supposedly significant and strange symbolism I loaded my story with was unconsciously "absorbed" from a few dozen films and TV shows; or maybe I am lying to you now and purposely added the symbolism to jump on the "Britney/Rhianna is a mind-controlled MK-slave bandwagon" (an action of which, I assure you, I made a tremendous amount of cash on and can now live a life of leisure).

But if all that is potentially true -- what are we to make about the case of Jimmy Savile? Was Savile a lone mutation, a metaphorical "Uncle Charlie" who floated into children's hospitals and the like, leaving a broken, twisted trail of abused children in his wake?

As I said and will continue to say -- I merely ask questions, here.

Read More