Rabbit-Hole News: Deathbed UFO Confession, Biblical Plague, MK-Kitten Bynes

Welcome to yet another edition of the Rabbit-Hole News, where we provide you with everything you need to know about what They won't tell you.

UFOS:

Is this recent "deathbed interview" with a former CIA official the proof of alien visitation of our planet we've been looking for?

"Anonymous" alleges that, after an invasion threat from President Dwight Eisenhower, he and his superior at the CIA were allowed inside the secretive Area 51 in Nevada to gather intel and report back to the president. There, "Anonymous" describes seeing several alien spacecraft, including the craft that crashed in Roswell, New Mexico.

CELEBRITIES:

Vigilant Citizen is worried that troubled actress Amanda Bynes could be yet another mind-controlled sex-kitten:

Amanda Bynes’ metamorphosis from a promising child star to a bizarre woman with worrying behavior is yet another example of how the MK-Ultra entertainment industry messes up the minds of those who grow up within it. While most media sources cite “drugs” or “mental problem” as causes of her erratic behavior, these are only symptoms of the true issue here: Bynes is yet another former child star going through a MK programming meltdown.

Still no complete explanation for Lindsay Lohan.


THE BIBLE:

From the AP:

"Any day now, billions of cicadas with bulging red eyes will crawl out of the earth after 17 years underground and overrun the East Coast." 

Don't worry, though...

 "... they're harmless."

BIG BROTHER:

A CNN transcript of a recent roundtable discussion of the Boston Bombings reveals this nugget of information concerning the privacy of American citizens:

BURNETT: Tim, is there any way, obviously, there is a voice mail they can try to get the phone companies to give that up at this point. It's not a voice mail. It's just a conversation. There's no way they actually can find out what happened, right, unless she tells them?  

CLEMENTE: No, there is a way. We certainly have ways in national security investigations to find out exactly what was said in that conversation. It's not necessarily something that the FBI is going to want to present in court, but it may help lead the investigation and/or lead to questioning of her. We certainly can find that out.  

BURNETT: So they can actually get that? People are saying, look, that is incredible.  

CLEMENTE: No, welcome to America. All of that stuff is being captured as we speak whether we know it or like it or not.

Um...yay?


OFFWORLD AGENDA:

NASA said recently that setting foot on Mars is "Human Destiny":

"A human mission to Mars is today the ultimate destination in our solar system for humanity, and it is a priority for NASA."

Start packing!!!!

Read More

"Iron Man 3" As Conspiracy Narrative

The new movie "Iron Man 3" has pulled in the second-highest opening weekend in the history of cinema. It also boldly incorporates popular conspiracy narratives that the mainstream media normally condemns.

Spoilers for "Iron Man 3" ahead.


Mandarin Is The Fake Bin Laden

The "twist" of the entire movie is that The Mandarin, a villain that looks like a cross between Fu Manchu and Osama Bin Laden, is a complete fake. He is an actor, hired by A.I.M., an Illuminati-type terrorist organization created by scientists and working with traitors within the government. A.I.M. purposely manipulates the public by having this actor and his pseudo Al-Qaeda type group take responsibility for terrorist attacks.

In case it needs to be made any clearer, at one point in the movie it is stated that Mandarin is a fake "just like Bin Laden and Gaddafi."

The idea that Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda are "fakes" created by the C.I.A. (CIA/AIM), the Illuminati, or another such organization, has been made by many high-profile people within the conspiracy theory community, most notably Alex Jones. From Jones' Infowars website:

The real Osama bin Laden is a Western-trained CIA asset with the declassified code-name “Tim Osman.” He was chosen to lead the Mujahideen / Taliban in Afghanistan, in part, because his wealthy family has been a long-term business partner to key families in the West, including the Bush family (Carlyle Group). In fact, George H. W. Bush, the father, had been meeting with one of Osama bin Laden’s brothers on the morning of 9/11. The real Mujahideen has been used for a variety of Western-backed political purposes, namely upheaval and regional-destabilization.

Further, Jones/Infowars alleges that many of the Bin Laden videos we have seen are fakes, complete with multiple actors playing the terrorist leader:

"Admittedly fake videos with bad look-alikes and audio recordings supposedly sent by bin Laden surfaced routinely just before elections (Tom Ridge later admitted that terror threats were elevated to help Bush’s re-election bid) or when the American people needed a reminder of the threat of terror. Prior to the admissions, analysts correctly suspected that al Qaeda video logos matched the signature of the CIA-linked Intel Center, revealing an unholy connection at the source of the video-taped threats."

Again: this is the crux of the entire "Iron Man 3" movie, its big surprise: basically, that an allegorical Bin Laden is a fake and a smoke-screen. And if Bin Laden is a fake, it makes the Seal Team 6 stuff quite questionable.

The question must be asked: if conspiracy theorists are supposedly hated so much, their ideas so crazy -- why was this the central idea of the film? Further: why did the American public so readily accept it by going in droves to watch this movie?

It is significant to note that there is also a nod to the MSM/government suspicion of Libertarians/Constitutionalists -- in the backdrop of The Mandarin's videos are the words, "We The People."


Boston Bombing Parallels

There are creepy parallels between the terrorist bombings in "Iron Man 3" and the recent Boston Marathon Bombings. In the movie, bombs seemingly go off in several high-traffic civilian areas. When Tony Stark's assistant Happy is caught in one of them, the tableau is extremely similar to that of the aftermath of the bombings.

Everybody thinks that the Mandarin (representing Bin Laden/Al-Qaeda) are related to one of the bombings. Another bombing is blamed on a "domestic terrorist" -- a returning army veteran. As Infowars has mentioned many times on their site, returning vets are being "profiled" by the U.S. government as potential terrorists: "The government seems to be obsessed with targeting disgruntled veterans with pre-crime and other unconstitutional forms of surveillance, demonization and harassment..."

The focus on people missing limbs -- including one haunting image of a little girl -- also subliminally bring up memories of the Boston Bombings.


Army Vets Given Mind-Control To Become Human Weapons

Tony Stark finds out the that real culprit is not Mandarin or the vets, but A.I.M. -- who targets injured army vets and makes them undergo painful experiments to literally become human bombs!

These vets are essentially Manchurian Candidates and "sleepers," who can "go off" at any moment. Jones and other theorists have openly wondered if the Boston Bombing suspects might also be "mind-controlled" agents of a shadowy group that were sent to commit the attacks. From an article on Examiner.com:

The fact that the CIA successfully trained unsuspecting individuals to place and explode bombs and to serve as assassins while under hypnosis back in the 1950s raises serious questions. Could the Boston Marathon bombers and even the Newtown, Columbine, and other school shooters have been programmed to carry out these destructive deeds?

Interesting to note: one such "human bomb" introduces herself to Stark as an agent of "Homeland Security" before attacking him.


Tony Stark, "Domestic Terrorist"

One of the most eyebrow-raising sequences of the whole movie is when Tony Stark, on the run from A.I.M. and the "human bombs," has to essentially turn to an "Anarchist's Cookbook" of home-grown weaponry to defend himself. This includes a lingering camera shot of a big bag of fertilizer he buys at a Home Depot-type store. I am surprised he did not buy a pressure-cooker as well.

Further: when Stark uses his "low tech" weapons to infiltrate A.I.M., he wears a hoodie and sunglasses...making him look like the Unabomber!

Why is Stark being show embracing the "tools" of "domestic terrorists" in order to save the day?


Traitors Within Government

A key reveal at the end of the film is that the Vice-President has been covertly working with A.I.M. to help them on their terrorist missions. This plot includes killing the President.


Conclusion

So here is what we have learned from "Iron Man 3":
* Bin Laden was a fake, used in continuing "False Flags."
* Veterans and Constitutionalists/Libertarians have been purposely targeted by "Homeland Security" as potential "domestic terrorists."
* Injured vets and other American citizens are used in MK-Ultra type experiments to create literal "human bombs" who are then used in terrorism.
* Factions of the government are working with a shadowy Illuminati/C.I.A. type organization in order to create "False Flag" terrorist situations and eventually conduct a takeover of the United States.

They say that every blockbuster movie sort of encapsulates the zeitgeist of the people who watch it; these films are inevitably a reflection of our very world. What does this all say about "Iron Man 3?"

Read More

Report: Boston Bombing Mentor Was "Exorcist"

OK, this is starting to get really messed up.

An NBC News report suggests that Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev's terrorist "mentor" Mischa was an actual exorcist.

Quoteth Tamerlan's Uncle "God forgives, I don't" Ruslan:

But there are signs that Tamerlan had become radicalized — apparently from a friend in the United States named “Mischa” — described as a Russian of Armenian descent who was a relatively recent convert to Islam and who lived in Cambridge, according by Tsarnaev’s uncle, Ruslan Tsarni. Tsarni told NBC News that Mischa presented himself as an “exorcist” who specialized in “removing demons from people’s bodies.”

If Tamerlan was manipulated by some "Black-ops" double agent (Sirhan Sirhan style) to carry out his alleged crimes, it's not unheard-of for such operations to include an occult element. Bringing occultism (even, in the case of an "exorcist," anti-occultism) into the mix can work wonders for manipulation.

Was Tamerlan "exorcised" by this dude, to remove anti-religious "demons" from his body?

Did that exorcism...I don't know...LOOK LIKE THIS???:

Read More

Book Review: "Thanks For The Memories" By Brice Taylor

"Thanks For The Memories" is a relentless, horrific, and haunting memoir about a woman who claims to have been a "mind-controlled slave," "presidential sex toy," and "personal computer." Even if you don't buy the basic premise here -- that the author was the subject of a massive multi-generational MK-Ultra experiment that involved being prostituted to, and tortured by, many of the key figures in politics and entertainment over the last 50+ years -- this is is still a must-read for both those interested in both conspiracies and just far-out narratives in general.

In short, is there an "Outsider Art" designation for books? Because "Thanks For The Memories" would certainly fit into that category. It has all the aesthetics of a Henry Darger piece. Also: the text is one big "trigger warning," so keep that mind if you have PTSD, abuse issues, etc.

"Thanks For The Memories" opens with Brice Taylor (a.k.a. Sue Ford) being raped by her father as an infant, "signed" into some sort of awful multi-generational abuse/slave situation by her "Uncle Charlie" (which I elaborate more on here) then later "sold" to comedian Bob Hope in a surreal cross between a child beauty pageant and a "child slave" auction. These scenes are deeply hard to read, and yet at the same time bring to mind, at least metaphorically, current pop-cultural phenomena such as "Toddlers in Tiaras."

Bob Hope: Mind-Control Guru?

And yes, I did say "Bob Hope." He is one of the two main "handlers"/masters in Taylor's life, the other being Henry Kissinger. While Hope keeps her (from a very young age) as a personal concubine, pornography subject, and sexual "gift" to friends (the scene where she is literally wrapped as a birthday president for Bing Crosby is particularly striking), Kissinger operates more as a MK-Ultra mad-scientist. The goal of both parties is to both deliver sensitive information to high-value targets in business, entertainment, and politics -- as well as entrap them in "honey pot" schemes to use as blackmail.

Taylor also claims to have been prostituted to John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and Bill Clinton (Jimmy Carter respectfully declined to have sexual congress with Taylor). Other alleged johns and/or pedophiles include Sylvester Stallone (who she describes as an aficionado of "dolphin porn"), Neil Diamond, Frank Sinatra, Elvis, Ted Kennedy (a supposedly especially nasty fellow), and so on. Each of these encounters are delivered in excruciating detail, complete with commentary as to who liked rough sex, who had a bigger penis, what their bodies smelled like, and what type of underwear they preferred to wear.

According to Taylor, Reagan had sex "passively"

It is at this point that even the most paranoid, dyed-in-the-wool scholar of Mind-Control/DID/MPD/MK-Ultra/Ritual Abuse is tempted to drop out of Taylor's narrative and dismiss it as utter rubbish. Her credibility is not helped by the relentless, repetitive nature of the storytelling -- much like the carousel-type rides/devices Taylor claims to have been forced to ride as she received her daily dose of "programming."

This includes the frequent use of rhymes as "programming cues," which are particularly disturbing and begins to entrance the reader him- or herself. There is simply not a single thing Taylor has apparently done in the first 35 years of her life -- not a family vacation, not even the mundane acts of stepping outside to cross the street -- that does not get tangled up in shadowy men snatching her and torturing her with cattle-prods and needles, or Hope/Kissinger sending the young woman off to one political sex-mission after another.

I just can't figure out how she had the time to do this all. It would have had to be that she was watched 24/7 by several interested and powerful organizations, being one of the most important MK-Ultra assets in U.S. history.

Taylor repeatedly refers to herself in the book as a "human computer" and "robot"

I would have to write like ten posts to get anywhere near a complete breakdown of the major points brought up in "Thanks For The Memories" -- and maybe one day I will. We have major political intrigue, a whole system of mind-control involving "human computers" who retain massive amounts of information in "files" within their brains, and, of course, the "New World Order" (the masterminds of which are referred to as "The Council").

Now, there is a quick-and-easy way to explain away the deeply disturbing content of "Thanks For The Memories." That is: early on in the book Taylor writes she had two very bad brain injuries, which she credits in part for "reactivating" her suppressed memories of being this mind-control victim. The brain injuries: they "created" this whole story, right?

But you see: that is the "quick and easy" of assessing this text. Using the "binary" method of the "Ultimate Yes" and the "Ultimate No" -- it either has to be all true, or all false.

don't know where this creepy pic of Taylor and JonBenet Ramsey came from...but it's creepy

In actuality, however, there are so many possibilities here:

1. Taylor made the entire text up on purpose -- possibly, it has been alleged, even plagiarizing content from other well-known "MK-Girl" cases like Cathy O'Brien -- just to make a buck off the credulous.

2. Taylor didn't make up the text and honestly believes it, but it is all sadly the result of a delusional mind.

3. Taylor remembered some content accurately -- such as the sexual abuse she suffered as a child -- but other stuff like Hope/Kissinger was the result of organic/psychological mental delusion partially brought on by her head injuries.

4. Taylor remembered some of the content correctly -- including being in essence a "presidential prostitute" and Bob Hope's concubine. But that she unknowingly overlayed these memories with an elaborate mis-remembered conspiracy/intrigue narrative (including psychic adventures, the dolphin porn, etc.)

5. Taylor remembered some of the content accurately & was involved in a horrible MK-Ultra experiment -- but her handlers purposely gave her "screen" memories involving celebrities an politicians as to "discredit" her story should she ever wish to go public.

6. Everything in "Thanks For The Memories" is accurate.

7. Lastly, what I like to refer to as "The Icke Maneuver" -- 85% of Taylor's story is accurate, but she added the more "out there" elements to make it seem ridiculous on purpose, so she wouldn't immediately be "taken out" as a threat. (I'm not saying that this is what David Icke has actually done with his own work -- but he has most certainly been accused as such).

not a flattering portrait of the comedian

For example, one of the people who contributed introductions to the book confirms that he saw Taylor work for Hope decades ago. An unauthorized biography of Hope written by Groucho Marx's son paints a picture of the beloved entertainment icon Hope as a rather unpleasant individual who did keep a number of mistresses and concubines -- as well as actively connived with the Republican Party to keep Americans in the Vietnam War and so on.

The Jimmy Savile and Vatican cases absolutely prove to skeptics that massive conspiracies to perpetrate and cover-up pedophilia do exist. Schemes to blackmail high-value targets with prostitutes/child sex is a very common tactic used in international espionage. And there are simply waaaaay too many abuse/mind-control narratives similar to Taylor's -- at least in the basics -- to dismiss all of these aspects of her tale.

So to even begin to suss out the relative validity of Taylor's book, one would have to do a substantial amount of detective work -- using the book as a guide, not an impossible task if one was so inclined.

My personal take on the book, based on just what I read? Looking back on my "possibilities" list above, I place it so far somewhere in the murk between #s 3-5.

Or perhaps I've completely been, as the say, "taken for a ride."

And hence the inherent pitfalls of delving into these sorts of texts -- the ever-present danger of falling into what Robert Anton Wilson dubbed "Chapel Perilous."

Yet, the desire for even shredded tendrils of the Truth moves me forward.

You can purchase "Thanks For The Memories" at Amazon.com.

Read More

The Problem With Uncle Charlie: "Stoker", Savile, and the MK-Girls Revisited

The poster for the movie "Stoker" - pay attention to that key around her neck

I have started reading the Illuminati/MK-Ultra epic "Thanks For The Memories" by Brice Taylor. There is a whole genre of conspiracy-lore that I call, for lack of a better term, "MK-Girls" -- narratives concerning women who are allegedly born into/recruited/exploited/abused and otherwise turned into sex slave assassins by a secret society/Illuminati/warlocks/CIA/etc.

 

While my description of such narratives sounds rather flip, these stories are on the whole harrowing tales containing every sort of horrible thing that can be done to another human being that one can possibly imagine. They also often feature the name-dropping of celebrities and/or detailed descriptions of "satanic" rituals -- two factors that usually lead most media, as well as the ordinary Joe, to dismiss such claims as the fantasies of a disturbed mind.

I've always viewed stories such as Brice Taylor's with a very heavy grain of salt. She claims to have recovered her memories of being a Hollywood/political sex-robot (I'm saying this literally) after having a vehicle accident that gave her a head injury -- this is very similar to the circumstances to which Roseanne Barr, who also claimed to have been sexually molested, experienced when she was 16. So the "easy" answer here is to "blame" all these claims of abuse (and more fantastic-sounding things, like being "owned" by late comedian Bob Hope) on some sort of organic brain anomaly.

But there are two things that have had me revise this initial assessment to be, if not completely credulous of all these claims, at least slightly more open-minded about them.

Jimmy Savile

First thing: the Jimmy Savile scandal at the BBC. This fucker pulled off shit that is on-par with Taylor's narrative -- beloved celebrity involved in massive serial underage sexual abuse, within a pedophile "ring" of other celebrities and persons involved in the entertainment industry. So for someone to write off "Thanks For The Memories" based solely on the claim that Bob Hope was involved...we can just take one look at the Savile case and revise that particular criteria.

Here is what one victim of Savile's told her doctor had happened; imagine if someone like Brice Taylor had said the same thing:

She recalled being led into a room that was filled with candles on the lowest level of the hospital, somewhere that was not regularly used by staff. Several adults were there, including Jimmy Savile who, like the others, was wearing a robe and a mask. “She recognised him because of his distinctive voice and the fact that his blond hair was protruding from the side of the mask. He was not the leader but he was seen as important because of his fame. “She was molested, raped and beaten and heard words that sounded like ‘Ave Satanas’, a Latin­ised version of ‘Hail Satan’, being chanted. There was no mention of any other child being there and she cannot remember how long the attack lasted but she was left extremely frightened and shaken.”

Again, it has to be emphasized here: this is a real investigation that is still going on in Britain and has been taken extremely seriously. This is not a self-pubbed book or a YouTube slideshow. And yet the stories of Taylor, this girl in the Savile case, and countless other women all seem to have similar elements. Is this the result of some sort of mass mental delusion? Is this the result of confusing reality with pop-culture? Or is pop-culture merely mirroring -- almost "confessing," if you will -- what is really going on?

I have no firm answer here. I am merely asking questions.

Second thing: I wrote an entire comic book for Marvel Comics, "Punisher MAX: Butterfly" that featured pretty much EVERY MK-Girls theme and symbol in it -- including a big fucking monarch butterfly on the front cover -- without any idea I was doing it. Every symbol: butterflies, kitten alters, doll imagery & porcelain face, Delta "assassin" programming, being "thrown off the freedom train," incest, dissociation, multiple personalities, etc. It was only in retrospect, after encountering MK-Girls lore, that I realized this comic was essentially one more (albeit unconsciously written) such narrative.

It should also be noted that the comic was targeted for a massive campaign against it in the comics "media" (such as it is) in an attempt to "bury" it (including one reviewer quaintly suggesting that I have my hands chopped off at the wrists to prevent me from ever writing again). This encompassed an intense round of cyberbullying (even directed to those who dared give it positive reviews) and anonymous threats of violence and death emailed directly to me -- the latter of which I took so seriously as to never appear in public signings again.

(Of course, what was the plot of the comic? A woman who, through a book, exposes a conspiracy -- and literally gets hounded to death to keep silent. So the irony of the situation was just bloody brilliant.)

 This all begs the question: is the MK-Girls mythos, and its symbology, some sort of archetypal thing? Was I tapping, in some shamanic way, into some bigger Thing by writing this book? Are these symbols and situations so ingrained in the history of humankind and its rituals (my comic book references Sumerian mythology at the end) that it was merely a case of "channeling" these ideas as soon as the fingers hit the keyboard? Is pop-culture to blame, putting strange ideas in people's heads? Or again, is pop-culture -- of which, by writing this mass-produced bit of fiction, I now belong to -- unconsciously/consciously mirroring some dark corner of our society?

Again -- I am merely asking questions.

All of the preceding is a rather large and perhaps unwieldy prologue to the synchromystic post at hand, about a strange, recurring figure in pop-culture: "Uncle Charlie."

We start with the trailer for the upcoming Nicole Kidman starrer "Stoker," a Hitchcockian (or Brian dePalmian, take your pick) thriller featuring a teenager played by Mia Wasikowska whose strange, emotionless "Uncle Charlie" comes to visit after her father dies:

As we see in the trailer, Uncle Charlie appears to be a complete predatory psycho, who not only acts seductively to his so-called niece, India, but seems to indoctrinate her into the art of killing and violence culminating with the girl handling an assassin's rifle:

Coincidentally enough, Brice Taylor had her own Uncle Charlie, a strange emotionless man who indoctrinates her into the world of sex slavery and political intrigue:

"Uncle Charlie was very distinguished looking and wore formal clothes...in a compete nightmarish horror, I watched as my grown father looked retarded and became very childlike when this relative, Charles Lilley Horn, spoke to him. And when the talk turned to subjects I could not fathom, and Uncle Charlie held out a paper for my father to sign...Uncle Charlie further directed my father where to take me for early programming that involved machines and told him about the arrangement with Bob Hope and the connection to the government."

Following up on the line in the "Stoker" trailer about Uncle Charlie looking very much like India's dad, we get this passage from Taylor:

"...Uncle Charlie very secretly and with great import informed me that he was my real father and that dad wasn't my real father...when I asked Uncle Charlie who my real mother was he just nodded quickly and said "You don't gave one, it doesn't matter."

Taylor's Uncle Charlie then allegedly introduces her to Henry Kissinger, which starts her down the road of political intrigue/prostitution.

In "Stoker," Wasikowska is very much portraying the MK-Girls narrative of the underage innocent who is seduced, possibly involved in incest, corrupted, manipulated and even driven to violence. If we want to find another thematic link to the actress and the subject matter, it is interesting to note that her most famous role to date is the title role in Tim Burton's "Alice In Wonderland":

Note how the symbol of the keyhole leads back to the key she is wearing in the "Stoker" poster

Taylor cites the figure of Alice as being very crucial to her programming. From a scene in "Thanks For The Memories" taking place in Disneyland:

"Next, the man took me to scary rides and poked me with needles in my waist and legs while he said things during the Alice in Wonderland ride, like, "This is not really happening. I am not really sticking this needle in your leg. You are just like Alice. You also ate the large mushroom and feel funny -- this is not real."

But as any film buff knows, the "Stoker" Uncle Charlie is far from the most famous. That honor would go to the Uncle Charlie played by Joseph Cotten in the 1943 thriller "A Shadow of A Doubt" (originally titled, "Uncle Charlie"). You will be shocked to know that this U.C. is also a creepy, semi-incestuous criminally-minded individual who manipulates his teenage niece.

Uncle Charlie in 1943's "Shadow Of A Doubt"...

...and Uncle Charlie from 2013's "Stoker"

So here you have this archetype of "Uncle Charlie" -- the corrupter, the "real dad," the indoctrinator, the metaphorical or literal perpetrator of incest.

Did Brice Taylor "misremember" her Uncle Charlie from the plot of "Shadow of a Doubt"? Is "Uncle Charlie" a bit more than that -- a predatory boogieman/tulpa haunting the lives of exploited teenage girls? Is it a "code word" of some sort for an actual operative that infiltrates families and indoctrinates these young women into some horrible type of MK-Ultra/cult type situation?

Psychopathic Eyes: The "Uncle Charlie" Archetype

I wanted to take a look once again at the cast of "Stoker" before I end this post. Nicole Kidman plays an ineffectual mother who is unable/unwilling/blind to the conspiracy that surrounds her and that involves her daughter -- a role much like the wife in the Stanley Kubrick "Illuminati" classic "Eyes Wide Shut":

And while Matthew Goode may not seem like a household name, he looked naggingly familiar to me. Looking him up on IMDB, I realized why:

He played Ozymandias in "Watchmen."

In the end, it could just be that Brice Taylor was indeed the sufferer of childhood abuse who created a "fantasy" world where that abuse included celebrities and political figures in a ring of pedophilia and odd rituals culled from a Hammer film. It could be that the figure of "Uncle Charlie" is nothing more than something used in a film in the 1940s, then "homaged" in "Stoker"...with Taylor, as suggested, being influenced by the former.

And perhaps all the supposedly significant and strange symbolism I loaded my story with was unconsciously "absorbed" from a few dozen films and TV shows; or maybe I am lying to you now and purposely added the symbolism to jump on the "Britney/Rhianna is a mind-controlled MK-slave bandwagon" (an action of which, I assure you, I made a tremendous amount of cash on and can now live a life of leisure).

But if all that is potentially true -- what are we to make about the case of Jimmy Savile? Was Savile a lone mutation, a metaphorical "Uncle Charlie" who floated into children's hospitals and the like, leaving a broken, twisted trail of abused children in his wake?

As I said and will continue to say -- I merely ask questions, here.

Read More

Megan Fox Declares She Won't Be "A Human Sacrifice"

An image from Fox's infamous "mannequin" photo shoot for "Interview" magazine

This recent Esquire interview with actress Megan Fox, "Megan Saves Herself," starts with a detailed description of Aztec sacrifices, and only gets weirder from there. It is a narrative consciously shaped by -- and fairly steeped in -- "Hollywood Illuminati"/"MK-Ultra Girls" folklore, with Fox portrayed as the sacrifice that escaped her fate. Along the way she discusses the Book Of Revelation, aliens, and speaking in tongues.

Tila Tequila tells the "Illuminati" to eff off

Really, not since the infamous Tila Tequila "Fuck You The Illuminati" rants have we had a celebrity like Fox so fully embrace this narrative, though one has to wonder if Esquire, like so many other media outlets, are "hep" to the idea that anything concerning shadowy Hollywood secret societies sacrificing starlets on a profane altar has a particular commercial appeal these days:

Deep in her house, Megan Fox and I are discussing human sacrifice. I tell her about an Aztec ritual practiced five hundred years ago in ancient Mexico during the feast of Toxcatl, when the Aztecs picked a perfect youth to live among them as a god. He was a paragon, beautiful and fit and healthy, with ideal proportions...The sacrifice's year was filled with constant delight, I tell her. He danced through the streets adorned in luxurious clothes given to him by the master, decked in flowers and incense, playing magical flutes that brought prosperity to the whole world. He had eight servants and four virgins to attend to his every need, and could wander wherever he pleased. But at the end of the year, when the feast of Toxcatl came around again, the perfect youth had to smash his flutes and climb the stairs of the great temple, where the priests would cut out his heart and offer it, still beating, to the sun... At the end of the year, the beautiful youth had to go up by himself. He had to go up willingly. That was part of the deal.

Now she is shaking her head.

"Not everyone understands that that's the deal," she says.

Megan Fox will not go willingly to have her heart cut out.

and, just to drive home the "human sacrifices" theme:

American movies expressed that great fusion of sex and art, too. They are magnificent pagan dreams, utterly profane and glorious. Such movies need bombshells. They need to consume beautiful flesh in their sacrifices. They need women like Megan Fox.

The whole article almost reads as Fox literally attempting to "save herself" by consciously acknowledging the whole "sacrifice" theme -- and, in doing so, "protecting" herself from it. She also goes quite in detail about her dealings with the church -- using that newfound religious feeling to also protect her, its symbology literally lining her house as to keep the "demons" out:

On the way out, I notice something I hadn't seen on the way down. In the hallway sits a tall pedestal topped by a red-and-gold Byzantine icon of a crucified Christ and rows of white candles.

Or is it all, as I wondered before, just a pre-constructed narrative to make her seem "dramatic," reeling in believers in the "Hollywood Illuminati" as Tequila has done. Both Fox and Tequila initially sound as crazy as loons in their articles/posts, claiming some degree of spiritual enlightenment; Fox clearly describes what sounds like a Kundalini activation:

"It feels like a lot of energy coming through the top of your head — I'm going to sound like such a lunatic — and then your whole body is filled with this electric current."

On the other hand, is it possible that both Fox and Tequila have indeed reached some understanding of how they've been manipulated in their lives and how the "system" -- if there is indeed such a "system" -- works? And, as in the case of David Icke, does such a realization dovetail with the sort of "crazy" that only Kundalini/spiritual awakenings trigger off?

Well, at worst this is just another mass-media appropriation of conspiracy/esoteric themes. At best -- if "best" is the right word to use here -- maybe there's something a bit more going on. And by a "bit more," it might mean religiously-induced delusions, a massive Kundalini opening, a self-conscious declaration of "freedom" from various secret society/"MK" bugaboos...or all of the above, in a sort of simmering stew of "maybes".

Read More

Requiem For The Doomed (And All The Mummified Cats)

Two horrible news stories competed for my attention yesterday -- soul-crushing, hideous, gory news stories in which the actual "newsworthiness" to me was debatable.

In the first, a man was pushed to his death in front of a New York City subway train (the train line I use, just for an added fillip of dread). According to an MTA public service poster I noticed coincidentally the same day I later found out about the death, about 40+ people died from being struck by subway trains last year. But what made this particular item of such visceral impact is the way our humor paper, The New York Post, reported the story on its front page:

The altercation that proceeded this poor man's fall onto the tracks was also filmed by one type of mobile device or another -- the important thing is, it was recorded. Recorded, another trifle on the iPhones and tablets and other gadgets. As I've pointed out in a previous post on a knife-wielding man who was shot in Times Square, the citizenry always are sure to record such anomalous events and tragedies on their devices, watch through lenses and screens at the gory drama about to unfold.

Then the Media covers the event, replicates and magnifies certain images for mass consumption. But the NYP cover is probably one of the most blood-curdling, "bread and circuses" tableau I've ever seen.

What is the accumulated mental impact on the populace as the result of being exposed to such horrors?

The second, barely "news" story was a segment on the show "Hoarders," about essentially the Ed Gein of cat hoarders. Cat owners, I will spare you the details, but it was the most disgusting, soul-ripping situation you can possibly imagine. This, coupled with an obviously deeply emotionally ill woman crying, cradling a mummified cat/cat-head in her arms and admitting she has lost all control.

If there is any real news about these two stories, it's about the inadequate mental health services provided to people in this country -- meager resources that are constantly in danger of being cut from governmental budgets. But you'll never see such items framed in such a way. That would be boring.

I write this in the context of a horrible nightmare I had last night. It started with a man, possibly a veteran, returning from war. He looks at all the giant ads and billboards surrounding him, and the symbolism really disturbs him -- triggers off deep post-traumatic stress issues. These are ads and signs not just containing violent imagery, but just deep, symbolic stuff that creates a sense of vertigo and cognitive dissonance.

As the dream continues, the man turns to me and tells me that I am the only one who can unlock the mystery of what has happened to men like him -- people who have been purposely fucked-up and mentally destroyed in these sorts of "experiments." These experiments involve the use of repeated imagery and sound -- I suppose MK-Ultra type stuff. He says the answers are "locked in his head," though there are books and other notes around the room I might be able to get more information from.

Then the scene switches to a room full of people -- regular people you'd find anywhere. A tone is played, and a certain light is flashed, and these people turn on each other, trying to kill each other with their bare hands and anything they find in the room. They become like complete animals. It's like something out of "The Manchurian Candidate," but with regular people not soldiers, and far more brutal.

Which reminds me of "The Walking Dead," and of this recent news story of a man who shot his girlfriend in the back with a rifle over an argument regarding the show. The substance of the argument? The suspect was convinced that a zombie-apocalypse type scenario might happen:

"...he felt very adamant that there could be some type of military mishap that would result in some sort of virus or something being released that could cause terrible things to happen."

I'm going to wind this all up with mentioning once again the "Summer of Shootings" that just passed, starting with the "Dark Knight" one in Aurora and quickly escalating to almost one a week. After a while, we still got those shooting stories...but they weren't big news anymore, barely a Twitter Trend.

Bored again. What will be the new Hotness? The Royal Messiahs? Junk Food Shortages?

Anyway, I also write a blog on Wellness, and really try to focus on strategies to shield oneself -- or at least purge the toxins -- from being exposed to all this. I don't believe in being sheltered. But we need the critical thinking ability to put what we see in context. And we need to Consume Content Consciously.

Read More