Rabbit-Hole News: "Zero Dark Dirty," John Titor, Lauryn Hill's Conspiracy

"Zero Dark Thirty": CIA-approved

Rabbit-Hole News brings it to you first: Lauryn Hill ordered to stop having conspiracy theories! CIA involvement in "Zero Dark Thirty"! Why Sylvia Browne's last name is a sync for a bovine bodily excretion --and much more!


MOVIE INDUSTRY:

Surprise! A newly declassified memo shows that the CIA actively shaped the movie "Zero Dark Thirty." From Gawker:

"Kathryn Bigelow's Osama bin Laden revenge-porn flick Zero Dark Thirty was the biggest publicity coup for the CIA this century outside of the actual killing of Osama bin Laden. But the extent to which the CIA shaped the film has remained unclear. Now, a memo obtained by Gawker shows that the CIA actively, and apparently successfully, pressured Mark Boal to remove scenes that made them look bad from the Zero Dark Thirty script."

I'm simply shocked -- shocked, I tell you! -- at this turn of events.


SYNC:

You've read the news story about the Cleveland abductions. Now read the synchromystic interpretations by Loren Coleman:

"The known rescued victims, to date, have been identified as Michelle Knight, Amanda Berry, and Virginia DeJesus. Their names allude to a mounted man-at-arms, a fleshy fruit produced from a single ovary, and a virgin linked to Jesus. They were taken from Lorain (= famous army). and brought to a location, Seymour (= Saint-Maur, Maur = Dark Skinned). A Holy Crusade?"

Also I think I've found a sync regarding Sylvia Browne's failed psychic prediction that one of the girls was dead. Browne = color of bullshit.


ILLUMINATI:

Self-styled "Illuminati hacker" Guccifer has added "Sex and the City" author Candace Bushnell to his list of "victims," leaking parts of her new book...this right after the balls-move of hacking members of the Council on Foreign Relations. From The Smoking Gun:

"The Bushnell hack came several days after “Guccifer” broke into various online accounts of two members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), economist Adam Posen and Karen Johnson, a former Federal Reserve Board official. The hacker also broke into accounts of Posen’s wife, Jennifer Sosin, a Washington, D.C. research strategist."

It's not clear why Guccifer, whose stated mission is to expose Illuminati/Bohemian Grove/CFR et al, chose to provide Bushnell with such brilliant viral advertising. I'm sure he/she's not some sort of genius shadow social media marketing wizard/psy-op gun-for-hire.



TIME-TRAVEL:

Pacific Standard has a profile on John Titor, the alleged time-traveler who predicted World War III in 2015:

"A poster going by the screennames “TimeTravel_0” and “John Titor” on a variety of message boards, beginning with the forum at the Time Travel Institute, claimed he was a soldier sent from 2036, the year the computer virus wiped the world. His mission was to head back to 1975 in order to snatch-and-grab an IBM 5100 computer, which had the necessary equipment to fight the future virus."

So basically, Titor has two years left to be right. Better odds than Harold Camping, I'd say.


CELEBRITIES:

Lauryn Hill, who has just been convicted to three months in jail for an enormous unpaid tax bill, had been forced to undergo counseling during her trial for having "conspiracy theories":

"During her trial, Hill was ordered by the judge in Newark, New Jersey to undergo counselling because of her conspiracy theories - including that artists are being oppressed by a plot involving the military and media."

Because obviously entertainers are never manipulated ever or have their lives fucked-with in any way in order to satisfy corporate greed. I mean, it's simply insane to even think that.

Read More

"Iron Man 3" As Conspiracy Narrative

The new movie "Iron Man 3" has pulled in the second-highest opening weekend in the history of cinema. It also boldly incorporates popular conspiracy narratives that the mainstream media normally condemns.

Spoilers for "Iron Man 3" ahead.


Mandarin Is The Fake Bin Laden

The "twist" of the entire movie is that The Mandarin, a villain that looks like a cross between Fu Manchu and Osama Bin Laden, is a complete fake. He is an actor, hired by A.I.M., an Illuminati-type terrorist organization created by scientists and working with traitors within the government. A.I.M. purposely manipulates the public by having this actor and his pseudo Al-Qaeda type group take responsibility for terrorist attacks.

In case it needs to be made any clearer, at one point in the movie it is stated that Mandarin is a fake "just like Bin Laden and Gaddafi."

The idea that Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda are "fakes" created by the C.I.A. (CIA/AIM), the Illuminati, or another such organization, has been made by many high-profile people within the conspiracy theory community, most notably Alex Jones. From Jones' Infowars website:

The real Osama bin Laden is a Western-trained CIA asset with the declassified code-name “Tim Osman.” He was chosen to lead the Mujahideen / Taliban in Afghanistan, in part, because his wealthy family has been a long-term business partner to key families in the West, including the Bush family (Carlyle Group). In fact, George H. W. Bush, the father, had been meeting with one of Osama bin Laden’s brothers on the morning of 9/11. The real Mujahideen has been used for a variety of Western-backed political purposes, namely upheaval and regional-destabilization.

Further, Jones/Infowars alleges that many of the Bin Laden videos we have seen are fakes, complete with multiple actors playing the terrorist leader:

"Admittedly fake videos with bad look-alikes and audio recordings supposedly sent by bin Laden surfaced routinely just before elections (Tom Ridge later admitted that terror threats were elevated to help Bush’s re-election bid) or when the American people needed a reminder of the threat of terror. Prior to the admissions, analysts correctly suspected that al Qaeda video logos matched the signature of the CIA-linked Intel Center, revealing an unholy connection at the source of the video-taped threats."

Again: this is the crux of the entire "Iron Man 3" movie, its big surprise: basically, that an allegorical Bin Laden is a fake and a smoke-screen. And if Bin Laden is a fake, it makes the Seal Team 6 stuff quite questionable.

The question must be asked: if conspiracy theorists are supposedly hated so much, their ideas so crazy -- why was this the central idea of the film? Further: why did the American public so readily accept it by going in droves to watch this movie?

It is significant to note that there is also a nod to the MSM/government suspicion of Libertarians/Constitutionalists -- in the backdrop of The Mandarin's videos are the words, "We The People."


Boston Bombing Parallels

There are creepy parallels between the terrorist bombings in "Iron Man 3" and the recent Boston Marathon Bombings. In the movie, bombs seemingly go off in several high-traffic civilian areas. When Tony Stark's assistant Happy is caught in one of them, the tableau is extremely similar to that of the aftermath of the bombings.

Everybody thinks that the Mandarin (representing Bin Laden/Al-Qaeda) are related to one of the bombings. Another bombing is blamed on a "domestic terrorist" -- a returning army veteran. As Infowars has mentioned many times on their site, returning vets are being "profiled" by the U.S. government as potential terrorists: "The government seems to be obsessed with targeting disgruntled veterans with pre-crime and other unconstitutional forms of surveillance, demonization and harassment..."

The focus on people missing limbs -- including one haunting image of a little girl -- also subliminally bring up memories of the Boston Bombings.


Army Vets Given Mind-Control To Become Human Weapons

Tony Stark finds out the that real culprit is not Mandarin or the vets, but A.I.M. -- who targets injured army vets and makes them undergo painful experiments to literally become human bombs!

These vets are essentially Manchurian Candidates and "sleepers," who can "go off" at any moment. Jones and other theorists have openly wondered if the Boston Bombing suspects might also be "mind-controlled" agents of a shadowy group that were sent to commit the attacks. From an article on Examiner.com:

The fact that the CIA successfully trained unsuspecting individuals to place and explode bombs and to serve as assassins while under hypnosis back in the 1950s raises serious questions. Could the Boston Marathon bombers and even the Newtown, Columbine, and other school shooters have been programmed to carry out these destructive deeds?

Interesting to note: one such "human bomb" introduces herself to Stark as an agent of "Homeland Security" before attacking him.


Tony Stark, "Domestic Terrorist"

One of the most eyebrow-raising sequences of the whole movie is when Tony Stark, on the run from A.I.M. and the "human bombs," has to essentially turn to an "Anarchist's Cookbook" of home-grown weaponry to defend himself. This includes a lingering camera shot of a big bag of fertilizer he buys at a Home Depot-type store. I am surprised he did not buy a pressure-cooker as well.

Further: when Stark uses his "low tech" weapons to infiltrate A.I.M., he wears a hoodie and sunglasses...making him look like the Unabomber!

Why is Stark being show embracing the "tools" of "domestic terrorists" in order to save the day?


Traitors Within Government

A key reveal at the end of the film is that the Vice-President has been covertly working with A.I.M. to help them on their terrorist missions. This plot includes killing the President.


Conclusion

So here is what we have learned from "Iron Man 3":
* Bin Laden was a fake, used in continuing "False Flags."
* Veterans and Constitutionalists/Libertarians have been purposely targeted by "Homeland Security" as potential "domestic terrorists."
* Injured vets and other American citizens are used in MK-Ultra type experiments to create literal "human bombs" who are then used in terrorism.
* Factions of the government are working with a shadowy Illuminati/C.I.A. type organization in order to create "False Flag" terrorist situations and eventually conduct a takeover of the United States.

They say that every blockbuster movie sort of encapsulates the zeitgeist of the people who watch it; these films are inevitably a reflection of our very world. What does this all say about "Iron Man 3?"

Read More

Rabbit-Hole News: Pat Robertson's Illuminati Theories, Bagram Batman, Bigfoot

THE ILLUMINATI:

Televangelist Pat Robertson decided yesterday that the public needed more of his pearls of wisdom, blaming the Bavarian Illuminati for gay marriage:

"It has been said that those who do not learn the lessons of history are doomed to live them again. If you go back in history to the French Revolution, there was a thrust spurred by the writings of the group called the Illuminati to destroy the family, to destroy the state, to destroy capitalism and to destroy the church."

Robertson's rantings will in no way be used by the media to make all alternative news/history enthusiasts look like raving lunatics. Oh wait, they totally were.


ALEISTER CROWLEY:

Along similar lines as the Robertson piece, conservative site Big Hollywood has picked up the OTO/Peaches Geldof/Jay-Z story from the Daily Mail -- though never mentioning the word "Illuminati." Crowley cited as sex-crazed maniac, though; cool to see that media still buys Uncle Al's press after all these decades. Makes you wonder if the "mainstream" conservatives (and I know that's a stretch when referring to Robertson) are starting to overtly adopt the Illuminati/Satanist narrative.


THE DARK KNIGHT:

Because our soldiers really need more of the blending of fantasy and reality in order to keep a healthy mindset on the field and back at home, a series of Army PSAs called "The Bagram Batman" teach soldiers how to be more prepared. Because there is nothing less "triggering" than the Chris Nolan version of Batman.


BIGFOOT:
Is this Bigfoot's foot? Or a bear paw?

If it was Bigfoot's foot that would be really cool. Let's all hope it's Bigfoot.


META-NARRATIVE:
This podcast by The Higherside Chats, interviewing author Kent Bain, contains a little something for everyone: 9/11, Sandy Hook, Hunger Games black magick, Baphomet, and, of course, The Dark Knight. I'll be looking at Bain's (Bain/Bane sync LOL) theory about "The Great Gatsby" in a future post.

Read More

Rabbit-Hole News: Nike Boston Sync, Crowley's Cult, Dzhokhar Groupies

SYNC:

Nike pulls their blood-splattered "Boston Massacre" shirt, an item of clothing made BEFORE the Boston bombings last week; the phrase refers to a 1978 Yankees/Red Sox game.

ALEISTER CROWLEY:

Occultist, mountain climber, poet, yoga practitioner, and AIWASS channeler Aleister Crowley has had a long, rich history of being called a "satanist" and other such scandalous things in various news rage; this article in The Daily Mail manages to connect him and the OTO to the Illuminati, Jay-Z, the possible human sacrifice of "an intelligent young boy," and Peaches Geldof.

In other news, Peaches Geldof is apparently a member of the OTO.


DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV:

According to Wired, there is now a cult of admirers/apologists for Boston Bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, mirroring other cases such as the James Holmes "Holmies" groupies and Columbine Kidz afficonados. Dzhokhar fans -- who use the Twitter hashtag #freejahar -- seem to be the place on the Venn diagram where Boston bombing False Flaggers/Deniers, teenage girls, and angry men in their early 20s who smoke pot all meet.


VIGILANT CITIZEN:

Vigilant Citizen would like to remind you that April is "Illuminati Human Sacrifice Month." Have a nice day.


ALEX JONES:


Is this an emo 16-year-old's gloomy video or the latest rant/tone poem by Alex Jones against the New World Order? You decide.

Read More

Played Out: Beyoncé's Super Bowl Symbolism



Oh Noes! The Symbolismz!

To be blunt, we need a new "hotness" -- Beyoncé's so-called Illuminati hand-gesture (or a plug for hubby's clothing line, take your pick) at the Superbowl was just so played out. Even Alex Jones was doing a half-hearted segment on it like he felt he "had" to -- but there was no passion in his usually fanatical eyes. He somehow tied it into Sandy Hook, I think...sort of like tying a cherry stem into a pretzel in your mouth. The fire was gone.

Vigilant Citizen also had its mandatory "Illuminati Messages, Beyoncé, and the N.W.O. Agenda" type post -- touching all the basic points, but admitting towards the end:

"...things were somewhat more subdued and abstract in this year’s SuperBowl"

OH NOES! (Jesus will save us)

VC also mentioned the mass-media coverage of said "Illuminati" connection to Beyoncé/Superbowl, noting:

"The mass media coverage of Beyoncé’s Illuminati hand sign, also reflects a new trend: Mass media are now directly addressing, discrediting and ridiculing “conspiracy theories” (I hate that term) in order to make sure that people do not start thinking too much about the strange things they are witnessing on TV."

And that's true, but I'm not sure the media is including this "conspiracy" symbology specifically in order to discredit "fringe" theorists. Some of these theorists, like Jones and his infamous Piers Morgan meltdown, do a pretty good job on that on their own -- which in turn is perfect fodder to hype on the news and, yes, discredit fringe theorists.

Jones, you were played.

No, I think two things are primarily going on here:

1) Esoteric "Illuminati" symbolism is now purposely being used by certain performers in order to build their mystique. This is why I felt pretty much embarrassed for Bey when she flashed that hand-sign -- it frankly just seemed desperate, screaming "hey I'm still relevant!". Lady Gaga did these things in a far more seamless, entertaining fashion but her light has been dimming as well. Rhianna's efforts on this front just make me sad because they're tied into this sado-masochistic/MK-Girl image of her that seems purposely cultivated by her handlers. And when someone like Justin Bieber does it...ugh.

nothing screams "I'm relevant" like teh eye thing

2) These Esoteric symbols have a "power" all on their own that transcends shadowy secret societies, the Illuminati, and what have you. They don't necessarily need to be tied to a larger "agenda". Shit -- you could take a week or a day to learn about this stuff and do it yourself! This is advertising/marketing/graphic design 101, my friends. The single eye. The so-called "666" sign. The eye in the triangle. Powerful, powerful images that strike us deep in our primal brains and: SELL US STUFF! (and, perhaps, accidentally evoking powerful energies that shut down the power during the Super Bowl; I'm totally on-board with that explanation)

I consider myself a "folklorist," if you will, of all these trends in esoteric symbolism and how they intersect with popular culture. And there is no doubt that the cumulative impact of a lot of this stuff -- especially if they are symbology of a decidedly negative nature -- is evident on the public. For example, "The Dark Knight Rises" is pretty much etched in the brains of our hapless populace.

OH NOES!!!11!!!11111

But also -- they are increasingly used as just one more tool in the advertising/entertainment arsenal. And maybe, if you look back at the icons and symbols of the past 100 years, they were always there. Just like pagan symbols such as Santa and the Easter Bunny.

The trick is -- to understand their meanings. Not just to prevent the New World Over takeover -- if you are truly interested in that, I suggest you start studying contemporary politics and economics stat. But to be empowered. To empower yourself. Why should only a relatively small group of people in this world understand the power of these symbols, and have them at their disposal?

And why should you cower in fear when you see the obvious eyes in triangles, the "one-eye" symbolism in your popular culture? We are not savages fearing the Scary Thing du jour, crossing and pissing ourselves, tossing kids on the fire to appease the gods and hanging our "suspect" women. The "Book" of choice will not save us. Look up how many of the sites and videos that condemn this symbolism in pop-culture end with "AND JESUS WILL SAVE US." Wow! Replacing one set of occult symbols for another. Bloody brilliant!

We need to get educated.

As for Beyoncé and the whole Super Bowl Half Time show -- man, I'm bored. This is all played out. What is the New Hotness?

My prediction: sigils:

Watch for sigil symbolism as being the Brand New Thing all over pop-culture.

Read More

Joseph Gordon-Levitt Warns Of "Larger Movement That Is Currently Dragging Us Down"

Very interesting words from Joseph Gordon-Levitt made in relation to his 2006 short film "Pictures of Assholes." The context: the film involves Gordon-Levitt turning the tables on paparazzi and shooting video of them as they shoot pictures of him.

The quote in question is from Gordon-Levitt's introduction on YouTube to the "Pictures Of Assholes", and seems to speak not just of the paparazzi, not just of Hollywood, but of something bigger -- what the young actor refers to as "a larger movement":

"The only other thing I'll say is (and I had trouble deciding whether or not to be so blunt with my opinion, but here goes) I do believe that the myth of 'Celebrity' is not just innocently shallow entertainment, but a powerful and fundamental part of a larger movement revolving around greed, apathy and hierarchy that is currently dragging us down, down, down, lower and scarier, and perhaps weaker than we've ever, ever been. Smile!"

What could Gordon-Levitt mean about how "Celebrity" is part of this powerful "larger movement" that is scarily dragging us down and making us weaker?

A very young Joseph Gordon-Levitt

Certainly, nobody is shedding tears for the actor -- he continues to participate in Hollywood productions big (such as "The Dark Knight Rises") and small. But he's also been in the industry since age six. One would imagine that he has seen a lot during that time.

But would that younger Gordon-Levitt -- currently one of the most bankable names in Hollywood -- insinuate the same things now as he did in 2006?

I'll end this post with a quote from "Dark Knight Rises," in which his character, "good cop" John Blake notes ruefully to Commissioner Gordon:

"You were right, about the structures becoming shackles."

Read More

Superbowl Blackout Blamed On "Dark Knight Rises" Villain Bane

In just another example of how deeply embedded our pop-culture is in our collective psyche, the temporary blackout at the Superbowl yesterday was attributed to "The Dark Knight Rises" character Bane by hundreds of people on Twitter.

The pivotal scene in "TDKR" involved Bane taking over a football stadium and holding the attendees as hostages. The profound resonance this movie has had with Americans is evident in these messages, only a small portion of which have been screen-captured below.

And yet, along with the quips and joking, there is also an underlying nervousness. Who sitting in that stadium didn't immediately think, at least for a second, that terrorism might be to blame for the sudden darkness? With Bin Laden dead (perhaps as much as twice), what bogeymen do we have to haunt our national subconscious? It is up to Hollywood to fill in the gaps:

Besides Bane, there were two other...entities, if you will, which were also evoked as possibly causing said blackout.

One was, of course, the "ghosts" of Hurricane Katrina, as the game was played in the rebuilt Superdome -- the Superdome in which so many huddled masses were abandoned after the flooding of  Katrina, some dying or suffering sexual assault. The Superdome is also believed by some to be "cursed" because of its proximity to Girod Street Cemetery; some Ravens fans blaming their team's largely unsuccessful history on the curse.

But, thanks to sponsorship by Mercedes-Benz, the Superdome was supposed to be redone and rebranded -- all that dark history behind them. Which reminds me of this Superbowl ad by Mercedes featuring a man making a deal with the devil (played by Willem Dafoe):

If that Masonic ring Dafoe is wearing in the last screengrab puts you in a conspiratorial mood, then you've found the last "culprit" for who could have possibly pulled the plug on Superbowl XLVII:

Read More

The Problem With Uncle Charlie: "Stoker", Savile, and the MK-Girls Revisited

The poster for the movie "Stoker" - pay attention to that key around her neck

I have started reading the Illuminati/MK-Ultra epic "Thanks For The Memories" by Brice Taylor. There is a whole genre of conspiracy-lore that I call, for lack of a better term, "MK-Girls" -- narratives concerning women who are allegedly born into/recruited/exploited/abused and otherwise turned into sex slave assassins by a secret society/Illuminati/warlocks/CIA/etc.

 

While my description of such narratives sounds rather flip, these stories are on the whole harrowing tales containing every sort of horrible thing that can be done to another human being that one can possibly imagine. They also often feature the name-dropping of celebrities and/or detailed descriptions of "satanic" rituals -- two factors that usually lead most media, as well as the ordinary Joe, to dismiss such claims as the fantasies of a disturbed mind.

I've always viewed stories such as Brice Taylor's with a very heavy grain of salt. She claims to have recovered her memories of being a Hollywood/political sex-robot (I'm saying this literally) after having a vehicle accident that gave her a head injury -- this is very similar to the circumstances to which Roseanne Barr, who also claimed to have been sexually molested, experienced when she was 16. So the "easy" answer here is to "blame" all these claims of abuse (and more fantastic-sounding things, like being "owned" by late comedian Bob Hope) on some sort of organic brain anomaly.

But there are two things that have had me revise this initial assessment to be, if not completely credulous of all these claims, at least slightly more open-minded about them.

Jimmy Savile

First thing: the Jimmy Savile scandal at the BBC. This fucker pulled off shit that is on-par with Taylor's narrative -- beloved celebrity involved in massive serial underage sexual abuse, within a pedophile "ring" of other celebrities and persons involved in the entertainment industry. So for someone to write off "Thanks For The Memories" based solely on the claim that Bob Hope was involved...we can just take one look at the Savile case and revise that particular criteria.

Here is what one victim of Savile's told her doctor had happened; imagine if someone like Brice Taylor had said the same thing:

She recalled being led into a room that was filled with candles on the lowest level of the hospital, somewhere that was not regularly used by staff. Several adults were there, including Jimmy Savile who, like the others, was wearing a robe and a mask. “She recognised him because of his distinctive voice and the fact that his blond hair was protruding from the side of the mask. He was not the leader but he was seen as important because of his fame. “She was molested, raped and beaten and heard words that sounded like ‘Ave Satanas’, a Latin­ised version of ‘Hail Satan’, being chanted. There was no mention of any other child being there and she cannot remember how long the attack lasted but she was left extremely frightened and shaken.”

Again, it has to be emphasized here: this is a real investigation that is still going on in Britain and has been taken extremely seriously. This is not a self-pubbed book or a YouTube slideshow. And yet the stories of Taylor, this girl in the Savile case, and countless other women all seem to have similar elements. Is this the result of some sort of mass mental delusion? Is this the result of confusing reality with pop-culture? Or is pop-culture merely mirroring -- almost "confessing," if you will -- what is really going on?

I have no firm answer here. I am merely asking questions.

Second thing: I wrote an entire comic book for Marvel Comics, "Punisher MAX: Butterfly" that featured pretty much EVERY MK-Girls theme and symbol in it -- including a big fucking monarch butterfly on the front cover -- without any idea I was doing it. Every symbol: butterflies, kitten alters, doll imagery & porcelain face, Delta "assassin" programming, being "thrown off the freedom train," incest, dissociation, multiple personalities, etc. It was only in retrospect, after encountering MK-Girls lore, that I realized this comic was essentially one more (albeit unconsciously written) such narrative.

It should also be noted that the comic was targeted for a massive campaign against it in the comics "media" (such as it is) in an attempt to "bury" it (including one reviewer quaintly suggesting that I have my hands chopped off at the wrists to prevent me from ever writing again). This encompassed an intense round of cyberbullying (even directed to those who dared give it positive reviews) and anonymous threats of violence and death emailed directly to me -- the latter of which I took so seriously as to never appear in public signings again.

(Of course, what was the plot of the comic? A woman who, through a book, exposes a conspiracy -- and literally gets hounded to death to keep silent. So the irony of the situation was just bloody brilliant.)

 This all begs the question: is the MK-Girls mythos, and its symbology, some sort of archetypal thing? Was I tapping, in some shamanic way, into some bigger Thing by writing this book? Are these symbols and situations so ingrained in the history of humankind and its rituals (my comic book references Sumerian mythology at the end) that it was merely a case of "channeling" these ideas as soon as the fingers hit the keyboard? Is pop-culture to blame, putting strange ideas in people's heads? Or again, is pop-culture -- of which, by writing this mass-produced bit of fiction, I now belong to -- unconsciously/consciously mirroring some dark corner of our society?

Again -- I am merely asking questions.

All of the preceding is a rather large and perhaps unwieldy prologue to the synchromystic post at hand, about a strange, recurring figure in pop-culture: "Uncle Charlie."

We start with the trailer for the upcoming Nicole Kidman starrer "Stoker," a Hitchcockian (or Brian dePalmian, take your pick) thriller featuring a teenager played by Mia Wasikowska whose strange, emotionless "Uncle Charlie" comes to visit after her father dies:

As we see in the trailer, Uncle Charlie appears to be a complete predatory psycho, who not only acts seductively to his so-called niece, India, but seems to indoctrinate her into the art of killing and violence culminating with the girl handling an assassin's rifle:

Coincidentally enough, Brice Taylor had her own Uncle Charlie, a strange emotionless man who indoctrinates her into the world of sex slavery and political intrigue:

"Uncle Charlie was very distinguished looking and wore formal clothes...in a compete nightmarish horror, I watched as my grown father looked retarded and became very childlike when this relative, Charles Lilley Horn, spoke to him. And when the talk turned to subjects I could not fathom, and Uncle Charlie held out a paper for my father to sign...Uncle Charlie further directed my father where to take me for early programming that involved machines and told him about the arrangement with Bob Hope and the connection to the government."

Following up on the line in the "Stoker" trailer about Uncle Charlie looking very much like India's dad, we get this passage from Taylor:

"...Uncle Charlie very secretly and with great import informed me that he was my real father and that dad wasn't my real father...when I asked Uncle Charlie who my real mother was he just nodded quickly and said "You don't gave one, it doesn't matter."

Taylor's Uncle Charlie then allegedly introduces her to Henry Kissinger, which starts her down the road of political intrigue/prostitution.

In "Stoker," Wasikowska is very much portraying the MK-Girls narrative of the underage innocent who is seduced, possibly involved in incest, corrupted, manipulated and even driven to violence. If we want to find another thematic link to the actress and the subject matter, it is interesting to note that her most famous role to date is the title role in Tim Burton's "Alice In Wonderland":

Note how the symbol of the keyhole leads back to the key she is wearing in the "Stoker" poster

Taylor cites the figure of Alice as being very crucial to her programming. From a scene in "Thanks For The Memories" taking place in Disneyland:

"Next, the man took me to scary rides and poked me with needles in my waist and legs while he said things during the Alice in Wonderland ride, like, "This is not really happening. I am not really sticking this needle in your leg. You are just like Alice. You also ate the large mushroom and feel funny -- this is not real."

But as any film buff knows, the "Stoker" Uncle Charlie is far from the most famous. That honor would go to the Uncle Charlie played by Joseph Cotten in the 1943 thriller "A Shadow of A Doubt" (originally titled, "Uncle Charlie"). You will be shocked to know that this U.C. is also a creepy, semi-incestuous criminally-minded individual who manipulates his teenage niece.

Uncle Charlie in 1943's "Shadow Of A Doubt"...

...and Uncle Charlie from 2013's "Stoker"

So here you have this archetype of "Uncle Charlie" -- the corrupter, the "real dad," the indoctrinator, the metaphorical or literal perpetrator of incest.

Did Brice Taylor "misremember" her Uncle Charlie from the plot of "Shadow of a Doubt"? Is "Uncle Charlie" a bit more than that -- a predatory boogieman/tulpa haunting the lives of exploited teenage girls? Is it a "code word" of some sort for an actual operative that infiltrates families and indoctrinates these young women into some horrible type of MK-Ultra/cult type situation?

Psychopathic Eyes: The "Uncle Charlie" Archetype

I wanted to take a look once again at the cast of "Stoker" before I end this post. Nicole Kidman plays an ineffectual mother who is unable/unwilling/blind to the conspiracy that surrounds her and that involves her daughter -- a role much like the wife in the Stanley Kubrick "Illuminati" classic "Eyes Wide Shut":

And while Matthew Goode may not seem like a household name, he looked naggingly familiar to me. Looking him up on IMDB, I realized why:

He played Ozymandias in "Watchmen."

In the end, it could just be that Brice Taylor was indeed the sufferer of childhood abuse who created a "fantasy" world where that abuse included celebrities and political figures in a ring of pedophilia and odd rituals culled from a Hammer film. It could be that the figure of "Uncle Charlie" is nothing more than something used in a film in the 1940s, then "homaged" in "Stoker"...with Taylor, as suggested, being influenced by the former.

And perhaps all the supposedly significant and strange symbolism I loaded my story with was unconsciously "absorbed" from a few dozen films and TV shows; or maybe I am lying to you now and purposely added the symbolism to jump on the "Britney/Rhianna is a mind-controlled MK-slave bandwagon" (an action of which, I assure you, I made a tremendous amount of cash on and can now live a life of leisure).

But if all that is potentially true -- what are we to make about the case of Jimmy Savile? Was Savile a lone mutation, a metaphorical "Uncle Charlie" who floated into children's hospitals and the like, leaving a broken, twisted trail of abused children in his wake?

As I said and will continue to say -- I merely ask questions, here.

Read More