"Patsies": A Deal With The Devil?

Tamerlan Tsarnaev: what the hell happened here?

If there is one thing that is becoming clear during the investigation of the Boston Marathon bombings and the Brothers Tsarnev, it's that first and foremost these men were "groomed" and set-up by their own family. It's like a horrible, horrible version of "Arrested Development," with the Tsarnaev mom as Lucille.

The mom was on a terrorist watch-list and was taped discussing jihad with her son. The uncle -- the one who threw Tamerlan and Dzhokhar under the bus and called them "losers" -- is now revealed as having CIA ties through a former marriage.

Frankly: while I do not feel pity for the Brothers Tsarnaev for their role in the bombings, it is clear they were sacrificed as two pawns in an international plot. They were made patsies, to take all of the blame. Most likely by their own family, then by the family's "handlers."

She could play the Tsarnaev mom in the TV-movie version.

And while I do not necessarily believe that these many events -- Oklahoma City, Aurora, Boston -- were "False Flags," I'm pretty certain that somebody, or something, is casting about for, and recruiting, young men and probably women for these sorts of missions.

With his many trips to Russia, Tamerlan Tsarnaev sounds eerily familiar to Lee Harvey Oswald. Perhaps a "Manchurian Candidate." Maybe this phantom "Misha" (who denies everything, and is also strangely not getting dragged into "interrogation" by the authorities) performed an "exorcism" on him, perhaps in the service of making him "a better Muslim"- really, some sort of mind-control or brainwashing.

Lee Harvey Oswald

But in all these cases, it's never, at its core, about religion or the types of ideologies the handlers claim it is. That's just smoke and mirrors. It's not about Islam, or Christianity, or Libertarianism, or Communism, or Satanism, or Mansonism.

It's about creating patsies -- an army of gullible and expendable people-robots who will never reach a higher rank in the organization, will never be initiated in the deepest secrets, and most likely will never live long enough to enjoy the money they may receive.

James Holmes

When I was in my very early 20s I received a college scholarship by a major foundation; this, despite the fact that I didn't go looking for the scholarship (it came to me, I was literally pressured into accepting it) and my grades were so-so (I was the classic underachiever). I attended a series of summer seminars, the first of which were about building an idealized new society (!), and was sent to these strange "mixers" with really important people where I was taught to "speak" and watched lectures.

Towards the end of my scholarship, I was offered money by one of the professors (who had his own sketchy past) to meet some of his "friends" in London and get a hotel near the meeting place. I took the money at first -- but then had a really bad feeling, shoved the cash back under my teacher's closed office door, and never looked back.

Was I being "groomed?"

Maybe, maybe not. Who knows? I just followed my gut that day. I just didn't (and still don't) believe that you get something for nothing.

Read More

Was The Boston Bomber An Alex Jones Fan?

You have to hand it to Jones, he uses pretty much every chance for publicity -- good or bad -- to try and generate more publicity.

The AP (you remember them, they were recently hacked and reported that the White House was on fire) ran a story yesterday called "Bomb Suspect Influenced By Mysterious Radical." While the radical in question was a shadowy figure called "Misha," the subtext is that the radical is actually Alex Jones -- whose website the article says Tamerlan Tsarnaev read:

"Tamerlan took an interest in Infowars, a conspiracy theory website. Khozhugov said Tamerlan was interested in finding a copy of the book 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,' the classic anti-Semitic hoax, first published in Russia in 1903, that claims a Jewish plot to take over the world."

Noted news site "Buzzfeed" then interviewed Jones about the article -- and the response was classic Jones:

"It's just standard. Anyone you talk to is familiar with my show. When I go out in public, half the people I meet in this country and in other countries too say they listen to my show. The show is bigger than the mainstream media admits."

Wow. I guess he is just a victim of his own success.

Jones is currently pushing the theory that Tamerlan and his brother were "patsies" for the government and are really innocent. He says this recent revelation from the AP was orchestrated to discredit his site:

"I've seen this before. The federal government trying to connect me to tragedies. That's the media and the government's own conspiracy theories."

As much as I think Jones' reporting of the Boston tragedy was incredibly ill-timed, unsubstantiated, and damaging to the alternative media community as a whole, he may have a point here.

Look, yesterday he was running video of him interviewing Tamerlan's aunt who said this is all a coverup and that her nephews were innocent. It's one thing to declare as "news" and "fact" (without any solid proof) that the Boston bombing was staged by the government. It's another to then get the suspect's family involved in your theories and your "cause." That, as they say, is the "big time."

Whether or not the Tsarnaev brothers acted alone, acted with an outside agency of one stripe or another, or were complete patsies -- don't you think their family (with the possible exception of cranky Uncle Ruslan, of course) wants to believe they're innocent? If this guy -- who, as far as they know, is sort of like the mainstream news -- presents this elaborate theory that their own flesh-and-blood didn't do the crime, don't you think they'd embrace it?

But that complicates things immensely for the government. So was the story about the suspect reading Infowars true, or was it "planted?" Or: could the story have been true, but purposely launched yesterday in order to "counter" the family's claims on Jones' show?

If anybody "wins" in this entire matter, it's Alex Jones -- who, for better or for worse, is now top-of-mind for the mainstream public. But the manner in which he is insinuating himself within this particular news story -- in a sense, not just reporting it but trying to become part of it -- is sort of a dangerous game, in my opinion. Regardless if he is wrong or right (or, as I think happens a lot in these cases, some vague area in the middle).

Read More

Rabbit-Hole News: Nike Boston Sync, Crowley's Cult, Dzhokhar Groupies

SYNC:

Nike pulls their blood-splattered "Boston Massacre" shirt, an item of clothing made BEFORE the Boston bombings last week; the phrase refers to a 1978 Yankees/Red Sox game.

ALEISTER CROWLEY:

Occultist, mountain climber, poet, yoga practitioner, and AIWASS channeler Aleister Crowley has had a long, rich history of being called a "satanist" and other such scandalous things in various news rage; this article in The Daily Mail manages to connect him and the OTO to the Illuminati, Jay-Z, the possible human sacrifice of "an intelligent young boy," and Peaches Geldof.

In other news, Peaches Geldof is apparently a member of the OTO.


DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV:

According to Wired, there is now a cult of admirers/apologists for Boston Bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, mirroring other cases such as the James Holmes "Holmies" groupies and Columbine Kidz afficonados. Dzhokhar fans -- who use the Twitter hashtag #freejahar -- seem to be the place on the Venn diagram where Boston bombing False Flaggers/Deniers, teenage girls, and angry men in their early 20s who smoke pot all meet.


VIGILANT CITIZEN:

Vigilant Citizen would like to remind you that April is "Illuminati Human Sacrifice Month." Have a nice day.


ALEX JONES:


Is this an emo 16-year-old's gloomy video or the latest rant/tone poem by Alex Jones against the New World Order? You decide.

Read More